home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- @158 CHAP 5
-
- ┌───────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
- │COMPLIANCE WITH THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT│
- └───────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
-
- In July of 1990, Congress enacted a revolutionary and wide-
- reaching piece of legislation, the Americans with Disabili-
- ties Act (The ADA), designed to make both the workplace and
- most public facilities much more accessible to disabled
- persons than has been the case up to now.
-
- This new law (42 U.S.C. 12101, et seq.) and related regu-
- lations (29 C.F.R. 1630), which were phased in over a
- period of several years, are already having significant
- impacts on a great many businesses, both in terms of em-
- ployment practices, covered under Title I of the ADA, and
- in terms of removing architectural barriers and other
- physical features that have limiting effects on the lives
- of disabled persons (Title III of ADA).
-
-
- NEW ANTI-DISCRIMINATION HIRING
- RULES REGARDING THE DISABLED
-
- Title I of ADA, effective for larger firms on July 26, 1992,
- prohibits discrimination against any "qualified individual
- with a disability" in all aspects of employment, including
- hiring and discharge of workers, compensation and benefits.
- In addition, employers must "reasonably accommodate" em-
- ployees' or applicants' disabilities, which may mean modi-
- fying facilities, restructuring work schedules, or trans-
- ferring disabled workers to vacant positions for which they
- are qualified, in appropriate circumstances. Employers are
- not required to accommodate a disabled worker, however, if
- doing so would impose an "undue hardship" on the employer.
- @IF014xx](NOTE: Because your firm has fewer than 15 employees, the
- @IF014xx]ADA discrimination rules that phased in between 1992 and
- @IF014xx]1994 do not apply to @NAME.)
- @IF015xx]These ADA discrimination rules already apply to you, since
- @IF015xx]your firm has @EMP employees (assuming that at least fif-
- @IF015xx]teen people are employed during any given 20 weeks of the
- @IF015xx]year by @NAME).
-
-
- MEDICAL SCREENING TESTS
- SHARPLY CURTAILED
-
- One area that is significantly affected in the hiring
- process is the limitation on medical screening of appli-
- cants. Companies no longer can, under ADA, screen out pro-
- spective employees with disabilities because the applicant
- has an elevated risk of an on-the-job injury, or a medical
- condition that might be aggravated because of job demands.
- The law specifically bans questions about a job applicant's
- physical or mental condition either on an employment appli-
- cation form or during a job interview. (Including general
- questions such as, "Do you have any mental or physical con-
- ditions that would prevent you from performing your job
- functions?")
-
- Medical exams are still allowed, but are greatly restricted.
- Pre-offer exams are prohibited, but an offer may be condi-
- tioned upon the satisfactory results of a medical examina-
- tion. (But results cannot be used to withdraw an offer,
- unless they show that the individual in question is not
- able to perform the tasks required by the position sought.)
-
- Employers should be aware that the definition of "disabled"
- under the ADA includes people with AIDS, those who test
- positive for HIV, and rehabilitated drug abusers and alco-
- holics.
-
- But note that the ADA does NOT:
-
- . prohibit voluntary tests, such as employer-sponsored
- cholesterol or blood pressure tests; nor
-
- . require employers to hire persons who are: currently
- engaged in use of illegal drugs; who have contagious
- diseases; compulsive gamblers; kleptomaniacs; pyro-
- maniacs; or homosexuals.
-
- ADA is neutral on the issue of drug testing of employees,
- in effect leaving that up to regulation by the states.
-
-
- ADA's employment-related rules became effective on the
- following dates:
-
-
- . July 26, 1992 -- Equal employment rules with regard to
- the disabled, effective for employers with 25 or more
- employees during 20 weeks of the year.
-
- . January 26, 1993 -- All commercial firms, not just
- those serving the public, must make NEW facilities and
- grounds accessible to the disabled, both to disabled
- employees and to customers.
-
- . July 26, 1994 -- Equal employment rules with regard to
- the disabled became effective for employers with 15 or
- more employees during 20 weeks of the year.
-
- @IF023xx](NOTE: Since your firm has @EMP employees, it is thus cur-
- @IF023xx]rently subject to the ADA discrimination rules, due to the
- @IF023xx]fact that the ADA threshold dropped to 15 employees as of
- @IF023xx]7-26-94. Prior to that date, the ADA discrimination rules
- @IF023xx]would not have applied to @NAME.)
-
-
- PUBLIC ACCOMMODATIONS FOR
- THE DISABLED
-
- Title III of the ADA requires practically all businesses to
- make their facilities accessible to disabled employees and
- customers. Examples of various accessibility requirements
- with regard to public accommodations include the following
- (in all new facilities, and where "feasible" in existing
- ones):
-
- . A specified number of designated parking spaces for the
- disabled provided, depending on the total number of such
- parking spaces;
-
- . Hotels and motels must have a set percentage of their
- rooms accessible to wheelchairs and other rooms must be
- equipped with such devices as visual alarms for the
- hearing-impaired, for instance;
-
- . Access ramps must be in place where the floor is not
- sufficiently level;
-
- . Elevators must be provided in most multi-story buildings;
-
- . In retail and grocery stores, checkout aisles must be
- wide enough for wheelchairs;
-
- . Theaters and similar places of assembly must have speci-
- fied numbers of wheelchair spaces dispersed throughout
- their seating area;
-
- . And many other similar requirements....
-
- The new public access requirements became effective for all
- companies (of any size) on January 26, 1993.
-
-
- TAX INCENTIVES FOR REMOVING ARCHITECTURAL BARRIERS
-
- Companies spending money to remove architectural and trans-
- portation barriers to the disabled can deduct up to $15,000
- a year of such expenses. (I.R.C. Sec. 190.) In addition,
- small firms (those with gross receipts under $1 million or
- fewer than 30 full-time employees), who spend between $250
- and $10,250 a year on access for the disabled, can claim a
- tax credit for up to 50% of the cost of such expenditures
- (a maximum annual credit of $5000). (I.R.C. Sec 44)
-
- NOTE: For more information on the Americans with Disabili-
- ties Act, call the U.S. Department of Justice's information
- line, at (202) 514-0301.
-
-
- ┌───────────────────────────────────────────────┐
- │ LEGAL AND ILLEGAL JOB INTERVIEW QUESTIONS: │
- │ (UNDER MAY, 1994 EEOC GUIDELINES) │
- └───────────────────────────────────────────────┘
-
-
- A set of questions only a lawyer could love....
-
- The following examples illustrate the extreme subtlety
- and technicality of the distinctions between "legal" and
- "illegal" job interview questions an employer may ask under
- the ADA:
-
- LEGAL QUESTION ILLEGAL QUESTION
- ----------------------------- ---------------------------
- 1 Do you have 20/20 corrected What is your corrected
- vision? vision?
-
- 2 How well can you handle Does stress ever affect
- stress? your ability to be
- productive?
-
- 3 Can you perform this func- Would you need reasonable
- tion without reasonable accommodation in this job?
- accommodation?
-
- 4 How many days were you ab- How many days were you sick
- sent from work last year? last year?
-
- 5 Are you currently illegally What medications are you
- using drugs? currently taking?
-
- 6 Do you regularly eat three Do you need to eat a number
- meals per day? of snacks at regular inter-
- vals throughout the day in
- in order to maintain your
- energy level?
-
- 7 Do you drink alcohol? How much alcohol do you
- drink per week?
-
- SOURCE: EEOC "Enforcement Guidance on Pre-Employment
- Disability-Related Inquiries," May, 1994
-
- ┌───────────────────────────────────────────────┐
- │ EEOC INTERNAL GUIDELINES FOR DEFINING WHAT │
- │ CONSTITUTES A "DISABILITY" UNDER ADA LAW │
- │ AND RELEVANT COURT DECISIONS │
- └───────────────────────────────────────────────┘
-
- The federal Equal Opportunity Commission ("EEOC"), in order
- to assist its staff in making determinations of what consti-
- tutes disability under the ADA and applicable regulations
- and court decisions, has created in internal manual for use
- by EEOC personnel.
-
- Under ADA, a disabled person is one who (1) has a physical
- or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more
- major life activities, (2) has record of such an impairment,
- or (3) is regarded as having such an impairment. The inter-
- nal EEOC guide fleshes out each part of this definition.
-
- "Impairment" means a physiological disorder affecting one
- or more body systems or a mental or psychological disorder.
- Excluded from this definition are environmental, cultural,
- and economic disadvantages; homosexuality or bisexuality;
- physical characteristics; pregnancy; common personality
- traits; and normal deviations in height, weight or strength.
-
- According to the Technical Assistance Manual on ADA issued
- by the EEOC, the ADA also does not protect the following
- types of additional disorders:
-
- . Current illegal use of illegal or legal drugs;
- . transvestitism;
- . transsexualism;
- . pedophilia;
- . exhibitionism;
- . voyeurism;
- . gender identity disorders not resulting from physical
- impairments;
- . compulsive gambling;
- . kleptomania;
- . pyromania; or
- . psychoactive substance abuse disorders, where the person
- is currently using such illegal substances.
-
- "Substantially limited," as the guide defines it, means
- prohibiting or significantly restricting a person's ability
- to perform (1) a major life activity as compared with an
- average person's ability to do so or (2) a class of jobs or
- a broad range of jobs in varying classes. Temporary impair-
- ments that take significantly longer than normal to heal,
- and long-term (or potentially long-term) impairments of in-
- definite, but not permanent, duration may also be consid-
- ered disabilities.
-
- "Major life activities," as described in the guide, include
- sitting, standing, lifting, thinking, concentrating, and in-
- teracting with others.
-
- Other portions of the guide go on to point out that even a
- person who has an impairment that does not substantially
- limit a major life activity may be considered disabled if
- treated as having such a limitation by an employer, or if
- the person is so limited only because of the attitudes of
- others toward the impairment.
-
- As you may have already realized, these are extremely broad
- interpretations of what constitutes a disability. Accord-
- ingly, as these will be the definitions relied on by the
- EEOC in interpreting ADA, look for enforcement of ADA to
- extend to many situations you might not normally consider
- to have anything to do with "disability," in the normal
- or traditional sense of the word.